Re: Bug#62378: Redundant directory and package name

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#62378: Redundant directory and package name
From: Alexander Koch <efraim@sonic.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 16:18:01 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000820161801.A26624@deadend.argh.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000820111944.D27061@visi.net>; from bcollins@debian.org on Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 11:19:44AM -0400
References: <38F7B44F.4531D791@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> <E12g4RB-0000Rl-00@orion> <20000414145743.C10665@kitenet.net> <38F7B44F.4531D791@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> <20000415112501.D15450@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <[🔎] 7kFtsliXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> <[🔎] 20000820111944.D27061@visi.net>

On Sun, 20 August 2000 11:19:44 -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > 2. Moving te actual RFCs is certainly an option. What does this group
> >    think?
> /usr/share/rfc/
> Makes more sense to me. I don't see a problem with the package name.

Same here.

Alexander

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#62378: Redundant directory and package name
  - From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
- Re: Bug#62378: Redundant directory and package name
  - From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#62378: Redundant directory and package name
Next by Date: there are different variables mentioned in the footnote about debugging and stripping binaries
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#62378: Redundant directory and package name
Next by thread: Re: Bug#62378: Redundant directory and package name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread