[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Bug#61308: PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles.
To
: Santiago Vila <
sanvila@unex.es
>,
61308@bugs.debian.org
Subject
: Bug#61308: PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles.
From
: Nicolás Lichtmaier <
nick@debian.org
>
Date
: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 23:36:57 -0300
Message-id
: <
20000407233656.C2043@debian.org
>
Reply-to
: Nicolás Lichtmaier <
nick@debian.org
>,
61308@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to
: <
Pine.LNX.3.96.1000406143329.9407A-100000@cantor.unex.es
>; from sanvila@unex.es on Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 02:39:07PM +0200
References
: <
20000406080538.C30573@ecn.purdue.edu
> <
Pine.LNX.3.96.1000406143329.9407A-100000@cantor.unex.es
>
> Looking for seconds. I'll give you 60 if you just wait me a minute... er.. I mean.. seconded.
Reply to:
debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Nicolás Lichtmaier (on-list)
Nicolás Lichtmaier (off-list)
References
:
Bug#61308: PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles.
From:
Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>
Bug#61308: PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles.
From:
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Prev by Date:
Bug#61308: PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles.
Next by Date:
Re: maintainers with bad email addresses
Previous by thread:
Bug#61308: PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles.
Next by thread:
Bug#61308: PROPOSAL] Initializing databases by using conffiles.
Index(es):
Date
Thread