Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Yes, it does indeed mean that, but since psgml + emacs is the only > decent editor for XML/SGML that I know of, I think it's necessary. What makes a `decent editor' here? I can perfectly edit them in vim and enjoy features like syntax highlightning as well. > Remember that Emacs20 is standard, isn't it? Some emacs is yes, but that doesn't mean it's installed on all systems. Removing ae, nvi and *emacs* tends to be the very first thing I do on all my computers :) Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpCdMsK2QSZu.pgp
Description: PGP signature