Mail Headers. Was : Re: ot: Winding up Branden (was: adding rationale commentary to the policy manual)
Indeed, my email client does also display the envelope header as:
debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
Here are the full headers on the email Tomasz sent, as recorded by the email
servers over here.
(Please note, my MTA might ">" in front of the envelope From_ line..)
>From debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org Wed Feb 9 15:01:41 2000
Received: from earth.willamette.edu (earth [158.104.100.101]) by
+redwood.willamette.edu (8.8.7/8.6.4) with ESMTP
id PAA05812 for <sarnold@redwood.willamette.edu>; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:01:35
+-0800
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [209.41.108.199])
by earth.willamette.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/happy) with SMTP
id PAA25823 for <sarnold@willamette.edu>; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:03:06
-0800+(PST)
Received: (qmail 27365 invoked by uid 38); 9 Feb 2000 23:02:55 -0000
Resent-Date: 9 Feb 2000 23:02:55 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient.list.not.shown:;
X-Envelope-Sender: bashiz@friko3.onet.pl
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 22:08:26 +0100
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ot: Winding up Branden (was: adding rationale commentary to the
+policy manual)
Message-ID: <20000209220826.A2471@priv3.onet.pl>
References: <20000208224633.G8900@ecn.purdue.edu>
+<Pine.LNX.3.96.1000209141130.7221B-100000@cantor.unex.es>
+<20000209162351.A18808@wb010.wav1.uea.ac.uk>
<87g0v2b8dh.fsf@kate.private.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
In-Reply-To: <87g0v2b8dh.fsf@kate.private.net>; from
+debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org on Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:20:26PM
-0500
Sender: <bashiz@priv3.onet.pl>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Resent-Message-ID: <e55Cl.A.ZrG.fIfo4@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-policy@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/7581
X-Loop: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 10:08:26PM +0100, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:20:26PM -0500, debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org wrote:
> > edward@debian.org (Edward Betts) writes:
> > > Why not just wind Branden up in retaliation?
> > > Look it is easy:
> > >
> > > X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS
> > > X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS
> > > X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS
> > > X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS, X-WINDOWS
> > >
> > > :-)
> >
> > Maybe there should be an IRC bot for this?
>
> Sorry for high offtopicness, but does only my mutt
> display `from' of this mail as `debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org' ?
> Look at first line of mail.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
Seth Arnold | http://www.willamette.edu/~sarnold/
Hate spam? See http://maps.vix.com/rbl/ for help
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into
your ~/.signature to help me spread!
Reply to: