Re: Wait, it *DOES* say all programs! (was Re: Custom undocumented(7)s)
- To: Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net>
- Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Wait, it *DOES* say all programs! (was Re: Custom undocumented(7)s)
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 02:22:08 -0500
- Message-id: <20000201022208.H7361@kitenet.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87u2jvgpho.fsf_-_@dsp.net>; from xtifr@dsp.net on Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 02:32:19PM -0800
- References: <14456.25212.108228.592293@pick.sel.cam.ac.uk> <87so070ykk.fsf@dsp.net> <20000118084743.B288@debian.org> <20000120025731.B3271@resonant.org> <87oga5u5cm.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <84ya99jykg.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <20000129093354.L30262@frederick.itri.loyola.edu> <20000129105404.V579@willamette.edu> <20000130001931.F14196@usatoday.com> <87u2jvgpho.fsf_-_@dsp.net>
Chris Waters wrote:
> Actually....checking...this seems to be true, and I don't think we
> want it to be true. Every program that's found in the default path,
> yes, but I was certainly under the impression that we don't want or
> need man pages for what might be called "private binaries",
> i.e. programs not intended to be run directly -- programs that should
> usually be found in /usr/lib/whatsit.
>
> So, as long as we're discussing the modification of 6.1, perhaps we
> should address this issue as well. Unless I'm overlooking something
> in policy that already addresses this.
Well I don't know, policy paints all library function calls with the same
brush:
If no manual page is available for a particular program, utility or
function and this is reported as a bug on debian-bugs, a symbolic link
from the requested manual page to the undocumented(7) manual page
should be provided. This symbolic link can be created from
debian/rules' like this:
The point seems to be, if it's something people would reasonably expect find
a man page on, something should be done.
--
see shy jo, in New York
Reply to: