[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: base dependency warning

On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 04:04:09PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I don't think the last 3 lines need to remain in policy.  Any issues with
> > removing them?  Otherwise this sounds good to me.
> Removing them changes who is responsible for that. That's worth a seperate
> proposal, I think it might be too controversial to tack onto this one, which
> is just documenting existing practice.
> I don't see anything wrong with the boot-floppies folks asking on -devel
> before adding stuff to base.

*shrug*  They don't currently, but if you think that's worth its own
proposal, this one is still good as it stands.

- Joseph Carter         GnuPG public key:   1024D/DCF9DAB3, 2048g/3F9C2A43
- knghtbrd@debian.org   20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
<stu> you should be afraid to use KDE because RMS might come to your
      house and cleave your monitor with an axe or something :)

Attachment: pgpFwPJ6G6vWd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: