Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Franklin Belew wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 1999 at 01:31:55AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> > >>"Joey" == Joey Hess <email@example.com> writes:
> > Urk. I find this confusing (perhaps I have far too set an idea
> > about what a maintainer is).
> > Joey> - Every package must have exactly one maintainer at a time. This person
> > Joey> - is responsible that the license of the package's software complies
> > Joey> + Every package must have exactly one maintainer at a time. The
> > Joey> + maintainer may be a mailing list. The maintainer is responsible
> > Joey> + for ensuring that the license of the package's software complies
> > Joey> with the policy of the distribution this package is included in.
> More nitpicking, this is grammatically incorrect.
Er, if there is a grammatical problem with the above text (as amended; the
original does of course have a gramatical error that I corrected en passant
by adding the text "for ensuring"), I fail to see it. Could you be more
see shy jo