Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
- To: Raul Miller <email@example.com>
- Cc: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
- From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 10:05:00 +0000
- Message-id: <19991201100500.C5799@polya>
- In-reply-to: <19991130220228.F14799@usatoday.com>; from email@example.com on Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 10:02:28PM -0500
- References: <19991129003946.B23998@mors.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <19991129220639.D7436@mors.net> <email@example.com> <19991201020348.J914@polya> <19991130220228.F14799@usatoday.com>
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 10:02:28PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 02:03:48AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I would encourage people to reread sections 4 and 5 of the social
> > contract. Debian *acknowledges* the existence of non-free software,
> > and "We acknowledge that some of our users require the use of programs
> > that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines." So are we
> > going to make life difficult for them by removing the suggests
> > information?
> The proposal is not about removing the suggests information -- it's about
> casting it into a different (cleaner) form.
As has been pointed out the information contained in Enhances: fields,
if allowed to replace all non-free Suggests: will me much less clean.
I look at /var/lib/dpkg/available frequently, and I am sure that I am
not the only one. And then I will have to start processing that file
if I want to see any non-free suggestions.
That's not cleaner.
(Mind you, allowing an Enhances field itself is nice, just not if we
are going to remove all non-free Suggests.)
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/