Redefinition of `extra'
Our `extra' definition is not complied by packages.
Policy says that package which conflicts with `optional'
package should go to `extra'. No httpd nor ftpd respects this.
And I dont see any reason of chosing the only proper {ht,f}tpd
--- cite ---
`extra'
This contains all packages that conflict with others with
required, important, standard or optional priorities, or are only
likely to be useful if you already know what they are or have
specialised requirements.
--- end ---
--- proposal ---
`extra'
This contains all packages that conflict with others with
required, important or standard priorities, or are only
likely to be useful if you already know what they are or have
specialised requirements.
--- end ---
Reply to: