Re: Thoughts about src-dep implementation
Hi,
>>"Chris" == Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net> writes:
Chris> Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> writes:
>> debian/rules clean is already required to reverse the effects of the build.
Chris> In theory, yes. But unless you audit the .diff.gz, it's not
Chris> necessarily obvious if this fails. Now, I *do* audit my diffs, so I
Chris> know *exactly* where I've come up short (one package, which I very
Chris> recently adopted, where I did a mostly unedited upload just to get my
Chris> name in the maintainer field). If I didn't audit my diffs, I think
Chris> I'd have at *least* four or five packages where the clean target
Chris> didn't do its job completely.
Yet another plug for cvs-buildpackage. I never audit my diffs,
yet I know for a fact that no junk gets into the diffs --
cvs-buildpacakge does a rm -rf; and re exports a fresh set ;-)
Possibly not very useful for huge packages like X; but should
not be an issue for the vast majority o packages out there.
manoj
--
So you're back... about time...
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C fingerprint = 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: