Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct

To: Franklin Belew <frb@wiw.org>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@msu.edu>
Date: 27 Sep 1999 17:53:28 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ogeo81if.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu>
Reply-to: pfaffben@msu.edu
In-reply-to: Franklin Belew's message of "Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:28:51 -0700"
References: <[🔎] 19990924120944.A25790@dman.com> <[🔎] XFMail.990927130528.shaleh@valinux.com> <[🔎] 19990927164410.A6934@dman.com> <[🔎] 19990927142851.A18703@wiw.org>

Franklin Belew <frb@wiw.org> writes:

> PS: I know my lines are longer than 76 characters, fix your own pager/viewers wordwrap

No, fix your attitude and read RFC1855.  Excerpt:

    - Limit line length to fewer than 65 characters and end a line
      with a carriage return.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate functionality
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shaleh@valinux.com>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
  - From: Franklin Belew <frb@wiw.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
Next by Date: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
Previous by thread: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
Next by thread: Re: Packages should not Conflict on the basis of duplicate funct
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread