Re: [forward] FHS pre-2.1 draft #3 on web site

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On 22 Sep 1999, Chris Waters wrote:

> No, it implies that creating these unnecessary, redundant, and
> arguably just-plain-*wrong* directories is *more* support than the
> whole /opt tree needs or deserves.  :-p  ;-)
> 
> Basically, while it may be a form of support, I think it's crossing
> the line from support to promotion, and I don't want to promote the
> use of /opt.

Sorry for the aol mode, but I fully agree.

If the lack of /opt is not a bug, and no package in the system
requires it, then I don't see the point in creating it.

Thanks.

-- 
 "9c1e4441a36094a7a804be5136989f4e" (a truly random sig)