[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: consensus on debug (-g) policy



On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 10:01:13PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Ben" == Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:
>  Ben> NOTE: I added a blurb about debhelper's dh_strip abiding by this policy,
>         Would you please reconsider? So far, the polic refreains from
>  mentioning any helper package by name, and rightly so.

Perhaps this should be included in the upgrading-checklist.text? (ie
"to conform to this change, if you use debhelper, just check you do dh_strip
instead of install -s, and ideally make the -g's optional; otherwise...)

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.

 ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it 
        results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
                                        -- Linus Torvalds

Attachment: pgpy8JeIJwpG8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: