On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 07:13:52PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 08:10:07PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > > And I have yet to hear a better idea to solve the problem. I have said I
> > > would withdraw my proposal if I heard another reasonable idea. Simply not
> > > using dpkg-shlibdeps isn't IMO reasonable, neither is hacking a binary.
> >
> > Agreed, can we please just push this through?
>
> Is that a second? =>
Yes.
>
> --
> Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux developer
> GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
> PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77 8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "my biggest problem with RH (and especially RH contrib packages) is that
> they DON'T have anything like our policy. That's one of the main reasons
> why their packages are so crappy and broken. Debian has the teamwork
> side of building a distribution down to a fine art."
>
--
PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E. Hull <warp@whitestar.soark.net>-GPG E65A7801
Keys available at http://whitestar.soark.net/~warp/public_keys.
CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged.
Attachment:
pgpovFTI9hgqD.pgp
Description: PGP signature