Re: [PROPOSAL] Archive audit, cruft removal, unmaintained packages
On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 01:16:21PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > Consider this a request for interest and comments. I've heard enough about
> > this over the past few months to finally break down and formally propose
> > it. This proposal breaks down into several issues, one is a proposal for
> > policy to outline procedures for removing obsolete and unmaintained
> > packages from the archive without regard to the bug count or other usual
> > deciding factors.
>
> First of all, I like the idea of killing cruft.
>
> I just need to know, how does any of what you're proposing have anything to
> do with debian policy? Policy deals with the interals of packages, and with
> relationships and integration between packages. Policy does not deal with
> who has the power to do what.
Policy needs to dictate that unmaintained and old packages will be removed
from the archive after a certain period.
Just a general proposal does nothing. I want it to end up in writing so
that this never happens again, aswell as voting a resolution to allow for
an appointed "audit" group to maintain the archive and keep this going.
If this is an incorrect place for proposing changes in Debian's archive
policy and general maintainer policies, then please point to the correct
list (note, I am speaking general policy not dependencies and such, which
the name debian-policy seemed to suggest was correct).
Ben
Reply to: