Re: I'm sorry to open another can of worms but.. /usr/share/man transition
Laurent Martelli <martelli@iie.cnam.fr> writes:
> My very personal opinion about all this, is that we need more
> abstraction : packages _should_not_ hardcode installation paths. I
> think that it should be an option that the sysadmin should be able to
> change anytime, without having to rebuild all packages.
I think this is a great idea in concept. I think implementation may
be a bit tricky, though, and I'd hate to have to rely on this as a
short term solution. But long term, yes, I would enthusiastically
support such an idea, or some reasonable subset, if it were well
thought out. Now all we need is a *workable* proposal or six. :-)
--
Chris Waters xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
Reply to: