Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
Okay, my two cents on the issue. I hope I'm not just adding more noise
to the ratio, but since I have no particular policy axe to grind,
perhaps I may be a bit more impartial....
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Kristoffer.Rose@ENS-Lyon.FR
wrote:
> Thanks for reopening the debate, Chris.
>
> I am (still) following it and I (still :) do not understand what is
wrong
> with the following'
>
> debian-policy [PROPOSAL]: /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc should be a
symlink
>
> I propose that the "transition" of /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc be done
with
> the following three changes to Policy:
>
> 1. REQUIRE that /usr/doc is a symlink to the FHS directory
/usr/share/doc.
Joseph Carter and others have pointed out that this is a non-starter.
However, Kristoffer's script can be adapted, absent this provision, to
simply migrate the files with *no* symlink.
Basically, to me there are just two ways to go about this "transition"
that make sense.
1. Don't migrate to /usr/share/doc. Require packages currently
installing in this location to put them back in /usr/doc. At least
until after Potato gets out the door.
2. Migrate everything to /usr/share/doc. Do it automatically for
packages which install in /usr/doc. One exception: for the sake of
users who may be confused by the move, create a document /usr/doc/README
which tells them where to find the documents they are looking for.
Regarding the script, I would modify it thusly:
#!/bin/bash
#
# Debian FHS migration script.
# Check that /usr/share/doc exists.
if [ ! -d /usr/share/doc ]
then
echo "Error: /usr/share/doc does not exist! Please reinstall
base-files."
exit 1
fi
# We must migrate (or fail).
usrdocfiles=`find /usr/doc/* -type d -maxdepth 0`
usrsharedocfiles=`find /usr/share/doc/* -type d -maxdepth 0`
echo -n "Migrating /usr/doc -> share/doc..."
# Fail noisily if /usr/doc is a mount point.
if mount | fgrep -q ' /usr/doc '
then
echo "failed."
echo "Error: /usr/doc is a mount point! Please undo that and rerun"
echo " the /usr/sbin/fix-FHS-compliance script."
exit 1
fi
# Check that there are no duplicates between the directories.
dups=""
for d in $usrdocfiles
do
dups="$dups"`expr " $usrsharedocfiles " : " $d "`
done
if [ -n "$dups" ]
then
echo "failed."
echo "Error: The following packages have files in both /usr/doc and
/usr/share/doc:"
echo " $dups"
echo " This should not happen and cannot be handled by this
script."
echo " We propose you remove these buggy packages and rerun the"
echo " /usr/sbin/fix-FHS-compliance script."
exit 1
fi
# We have a go for migration! Copy /usr/doc/* to /usr/share/doc/*.
cd /usr/doc
for d in $usrdocfiles
do
cp -a $d /usr/share/doc/$d
if ! diff -rq $d /usr/share/doc/$d >/dev/null 2>&1
then
echo failed."
echo "Error: Could not copy /usr/doc/$d to /usr/share/doc."
echo -n "Cleaning up..."
rm -fr /usr/share/doc/$d
echo "done."
exit 1
fi
rm -fr $d
if [ -d $d ]
then
echo "failed."
echo "Error: Could not remove /usr/doc/$d!"
echo " Your system may be in a very bad state - sorry."
exit 1
fi
done
# We're done.
echo "done."
exit
Reply to: