Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net>
- Date: 03 Aug 1999 17:02:45 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87vhaw8lay.fsf@dsp.net>
- In-reply-to: Anthony Towns's message of "Sat, 31 Jul 1999 22:27:42 +1000"
- References: <E116OEV-0004dl-00@thrak> <87zp0r9iwf.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <87wvvtdes8.fsf@dsp.net> <87iu7d8g2l.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <87n1wncqjz.fsf@dsp.net> <87u2qtb1p3.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <87d7x9agfg.fsf_-_@dsp.net> <19990731124625.A7877@azure.humbug.org.au> <87wvvhcm1d.fsf@dsp.net> <19990731222742.B10169@azure.humbug.org.au>
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> As I understand it, formal objections are "I never want to see this
> implemented" -- and five of them are enough to say "This solution will
> not be implemented by the policy group no matter what else may happen,
> ever";
I have no idea where you came up with this. I read the proposal
policy pretty carefully when I made my own proposal a couple of months
ago, and I just double-checked them, and I see *nothing* like this!
In fact, the proposal policy is (deliberately, I thought) quite vague
on what, if anything, is the difference between a "formal" objection
and an informal one. This is all supposed to be a fairly informal
process -- things which don't have concensus are handled in other ways.
> The above was, btw, a cheap shot on my part about the formal objection.
> Chris has made it quite clear in his posts that he *is* open minded on
> the issue, as, I suspect, are most of us.
Thanks, good to know I'm not being *totally* misinterpreted here. I
agree that if you believe all this stuff about five formal proposals,
and no recourse, and all that, what I did may look harsh. But I can't
find anything like that, and Manoj was *totally* ignoring several
objections that didn't include the magic phrase "formal objection".
I see nothing really making that magic phrase special in the proposal
policy, but since I didn't want to be completely ignored like those
others, I used it. :-)
> Some of the formal wrangling seems to be getting in the way of
> finding and discussing an acceptable solution however.
I think it's just a complex issue. Those do occur once in a while. :-)
cheers
--
Chris Waters xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
Reply to: