Re: Software in main that is throughly useless without non-free software
>>>>> "Remco" == Remco Blaakmeer <remco-blaakmeer@quicknet.nl> writes:
Remco> Now, I ask the same question again but with a little
Remco> difference: Since Policy defines which packages can go into
Remco> 'main' and which can't, can somebody please point out which
Remco> part of Policy these programs fail? I have read the
Remco> requirements for packages that want to go into main. I
Remco> don't see what's wrong with free packages that talk
Remco> proprietary protocols for which is no free 'other end'
Remco> available, as far as Policy is concerned.
We've accepted that the Linux kernel itself can go into main, even
though it's got support for non-freed proprietary filesystems.
So why not a reader for Word documents?
Reply to: