Previously Santiago Vila wrote: > Is this to be considered "distribution-wise"? > i.e. Is this to be applied to hamm, slink, potato, in an independent way? I think so, because packages that may be required in release N could be obsolete in release N+1 and deserve a lower priority there. Wichert (wondering if he missed something here) -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
Attachment:
pgp0beuuGpm1O.pgp
Description: PGP signature