Re: [PROPOSED] Merging the packaging manual and policy packages
> Hi,
>
> Iff we agree that the packaging manual has the weight of
> Policy, I propose, as a purely packaging issue, to pull the two
> packages (not the documents -- the policy and the packaging manuals
> shall remain distinct documents). The policy manual package already
> contains the FSSTND document, so this merger is not without
> precedent.
I haven't checked out the potato version, but when this is done, can
we PLEASE ensure that the latest version of the FSSTND document is
included rather than a way-out-of-date one? (See bug#29408.)
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey Email: J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Dept of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary & Westfield College,
Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, ENGLAND
-*- Finger jdg@goedel.maths.qmw.ac.uk for my PGP public key. -*-
Reply to: