[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy



Hi,
>>"Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <apharris@burrito.onshore.com> writes:

 Adam> In article <[🔎] 87n25dlshb.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> writes:

 >> The idea is that while sub policy documents are being hammered
 >> out, they remain in an xternal document under control of the authors
 >> of the sub policy (genrally, these consist of the developers of the
 >> packages affected). This allows for faster turnover, while still
 >> giving the document the weight of policy.

 >> Once the documents have stabilized, they are meant to be
 >> brought under the aegis of the policy group.

 Adam> I object.  The policy document should not have the specific technical
 Adam> information contained in a sub-policy, generally.  However, it would
 Adam> be nice to have "officially blessed sub policies" which are mentioned
 Adam> at least in Policy.

	I disagree. If a document is indeed carrying the weight of
 policy, I would like to see it in one place, rather than having to
 install a gazillion packages and hunting for the document in
 question. 

	It makes sense to allow the mini-policy author to have greater
 control while the document is being hammered out, but when it
 stabilizes there is no need to not have it in the policy package.

	In short,

 a) We would like to keep all the policy documents in one place, not
    scattered over different packages 
 b) The sub policy documents should not be at the whim of any one
    person for an indefinite interval. After they stabilize, and hence
    do not need immediate and continuous rewrites from the author(s),
    the sub documents should be brought under the democratic control
    as exercised by this mailing list. 
 c) Putting the document under this mailing list shall ensure that no
    part of Debian policy is again subject to the whims of any
    individual (no matter how exemplary that person may be).

	I would object to mentioning the documents in the main policy
 document until they are brought out into the open, and distributed
 with the other policy documents.

	manoj
-- 
 You will be held hostage by a radical group.
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E


Reply to: