debian-policy Nov 1998 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Bug#26461: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 98.09.24] obsolete reference to /usr/doc/copyright)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#7890: marked as done ([AMENDMENT] Policy manual contradicts itself about including docs)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#21185: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 98.09.24] lintian: Lintian gripes about Changelog.html)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#25385: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 98.09.24] please add new architecture)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#25911: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 98.09.24] Policy 5.5 (Log files) should be moved)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Manoj Srivastava
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Joey Hess
Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#17621: PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Joey Hess
Bug#17621: PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Joel Rosdahl
Bug#17621: PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
David Frey
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Marco d'Itri
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Guy Maor
Bug#17621: PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Davide G. M. Salvetti
Re: Bug#17621: PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#14701: [Amendment 98.11.01] bashism in Packaging Manual
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#15946: [AMENDMENT 98.11.01] time stamps should be preserved
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#17620: [AMENDMENT 98.11.01] Package build process must be non-interactive
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#17620: AMENDMENT 98.11.01] Package build process must be non-interactive
Marcus Brinkmann
Bug#22007: [AMENDMENT 98.11.01] Fixing of typo in packaging manual
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#22007: AMENDMENT 98.11.01] Fixing of typo in packaging manual
Marcus Brinkmann
Processed: Accepted amendments
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Formal Amendmenst
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: make all current proposals conform to the new convention
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: [PROPOSED] Quicktrack to fixing typos
Zed Pobre
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [PROPOSED] Quicktrack to fixing typos
Ian Jackson
Re: [PROPOSED] Quicktrack to fixing typos
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Quicktrack to fixing typos
Nils Lohner
Bug#15946: PROPOSED] time stamps should be preserved
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: RfD: Policy of .sh boot scripts
Ian Jackson
Re: FWD: Bug#22007: [PROPOSED] Fixing of typo in packaging manual
Ian Jackson
Re: FHS - transition
Ian Jackson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: FHS - transition
Ian Jackson
Re: FHS - transition
Ian Jackson
Re: FHS - transition
Michael Stone
Re: FHS - transition
Raul Miller
Re: FHS - transition
Ian Jackson
Re: FHS - transition
Michael Stone
Re: FHS - transition
Charles Briscoe-Smith
Re: FHS - transition
Kai Henningsen
Wanted - Un-SuperCite elisp package
Ian Jackson
Re: Wanted - Un-SuperCite elisp package
Ben Gertzfield
Re: Wanted - Un-SuperCite elisp package
Manoj Srivastava
It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Santiago Vila
RE: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Shaleh
RE: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Santiago Vila
Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
warp
RE: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Shaleh
Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
James Troup
Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
James Troup
Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Santiago Vila
Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Version}?
Ben Gertzfield
RE: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Vers
Shaleh
Re: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Vers
James Troup
Re: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Version}?
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Version}?
James Troup
Re: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Version}?
Ben Gertzfield
Re: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Version}?
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Version}?
Ben Gertzfield
Re: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Version}?
Richard Braakman
Re: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Version}?
Ben Gertzfield
Re: Should -dev and -dbg libary packages depend on ${Source-Version}?
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Policy for /usr/doc/<pkg-name>-doc
Federico Di Gregorio
Re: Policy for /usr/doc/<pkg-name>-doc
Raul Miller
Re: Policy for /usr/doc/<pkg-name>-doc
Raul Miller
Re: Policy for /usr/doc/<pkg-name>-doc
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#25057 acknowledged by developer (libdbi-perl is is subtly wrong)
Raul Miller
proving a bug is gone
Adam Di Carlo
Re: proving a bug is gone
Daniel Martin
Re: proving a bug is gone
Raul Miller
Re: proving a bug is gone
Raul Miller
Re: proving a bug is gone
Adam Di Carlo
Re: proving a bug is gone
Raul Miller
Re: proving a bug is gone
Adam Di Carlo
Re: proving a bug is gone
Brandon Mitchell
Re: proving a bug is gone
Philip Hands
Re: proving a bug is gone
Manoj Srivastava
keeping a fixed bug fixed (was Re: proving a bug is gone)
Raul Miller
Re: keeping a fixed bug fixed (was Re: proving a bug is gone)
Manoj Srivastava
Re: keeping a fixed bug fixed (was Re: proving a bug is gone)
Daniel Martin
Re: keeping a fixed bug fixed (was Re: proving a bug is gone)
Steve Greenland
Re: keeping a fixed bug fixed (was Re: proving a bug is gone)
Raul Miller
Configuration management / proposal
Raphael Hertzog
Re: Configuration management / proposal
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Configuration management / proposal
Raphael Hertzog
Re: Configuration management / proposal
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Configuration management / proposal
Raphael Hertzog
Packaging Manual 4.2.14 (Distribution:)
Zed Pobre
Re: Packaging Manual 4.2.14 (Distribution:)
Guy Maor
Re: Packaging Manual 4.2.14 (Distribution:)
Zed Pobre
Re: Packaging Manual 4.2.14 (Distribution:)
Adam Di Carlo
Old FSSTND in debian-policy package
Julian Gilbey
Configuration management again
Tom Lees
Question on a copyright
Alexander Koch
Re: Question on a copyright
warp
Re: Question on a copyright
Raul Miller
Re: Question on a copyright
john
/etc/environment (related with bug #28446)
Francesco Potorti`
Re: /etc/environment (related with bug #28446)
Ian Jackson
Re: /etc/environment (related with bug #28446)
Michael Stone
Re: /etc/environment (related with bug #28446)
Ian Jackson
Re: /etc/environment (related with bug #28446)
Wichert Akkerman
Re: /etc/environment (related with bug #28446)
Ian Jackson
Re: /etc/environment
Guy's Account
Re: /etc/environment (related with bug #28446)
Guy Maor
Re: /etc/environment (related with bug #28446)
Francesco Potorti`
Bug#29522: diversions
Matthias Klose
Bug#29522: diversions
Charles Briscoe-Smith
[bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov: Proposal]
Ben Collins
Re: [bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov: Proposal]
Davide G. M. Salvetti
Re: [bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov: Proposal]
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov: Proposal]
Drake Diedrich
Re: [bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov: Proposal]
Clint Guillot
Re: [bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov: Proposal]
john
Re: [bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov: Proposal]
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov: Proposal]
Ben Collins
Re: [bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov: Proposal]
Joseph Carter
Re: unstripped files
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Proposal
Ben Collins
Re: Proposal
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Proposal
Ben Collins
Re: Proposal
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Proposal
Ben Collins
Re: Proposal
Marcus . Brinkmann
Re: Proposal
john
Comments on new archive setup
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Comments on new archive setup
Joseph Carter
Re: Comments on new archive setup
joostje
Updates on restricted package proposal
Ben Collins
pending normal debian bugs for Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Nag
Re: [scoop@freshmeat.net: gnumaniak 1.0]
Ben Pfaff
Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Santiago Vila
Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Adam Di Carlo
Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Richard Braakman
Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Adam Di Carlo
Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Santiago Vila
Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Wichert Akkerman
Processed: Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Bob Hilliard
Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Bob Hilliard
Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Steve Greenland
Bug#29770: marked as done (Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases)
Debian Bug Tracking System
.Z files in debian packages
Joey Hess
Re: .Z files in debian packages
John Lapeyre
Re: .Z files in debian packages
Craig Small
Mangling other people's code
Ian Jackson
Re: Mangling other people's code
Michael Alan Dorman
Re: Mangling other people's code
Adam Di Carlo
debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
Michael Alan Dorman
Re: debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
Havoc Pennington
Re: debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
Adam Di Carlo
Re: debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
Michael Alan Dorman
Re: debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
Craig Brozefsky
Re: Mangling other people's code
Martin Mitchell
Re: Mangling other people's code
john
Re: Mangling other people's code
Guy Maor
Re: Mangling other people's code
Richard Braakman
Re: Mangling other people's code
Ardo van Rangelrooij
Re: Mangling other people's code
Raul Miller
Re: Mangling other people's code
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Mangling other people's code
Paul Serice
Re: Mangling other people's code
Joey Hess
developer's ref -- new chapter on NMUs and ports
Adam Di Carlo
Re: developer's ref -- new chapter on NMUs and ports
Ben Gertzfield
Re: developer's ref -- new chapter on NMUs and ports
Hamish Moffatt
Re: developer's ref -- new chapter on NMUs and ports
Adam Di Carlo
Re: scanf: floating point formats not linked
Robert Tkaczyk
Re: Dziwne zachowanie sendmaila
Andrzej Filip
Re: Cyfrowe lacza TP S.A.
Szymon Sokol
Re: Klawiatury sa do d*** (Re: To jest do d***)
Andrzej Boczek
Czy mozna edytowac AMIBIOS'a z poziomu systemu operacyjnego ?
Leszek =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Leszczy=F1ski
Re: Podkrecanie PII 300 ?
akane
Re: bylo: jak zwykle o wszystkim...
Darius Jack
Bug#29955: policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual
Bob Hilliard
Re: Bug#29955: policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Bug#29955: policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual
Richard Braakman
Re: Bug#29955: policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual
James Troup
Re: Bug#29955: policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual
Bob Hilliard
Bug#29955: policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#29955: policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#29955: marked as done (policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Commercial .debs
Oliver Elphick
Re: Commercial .debs
Arto Astala
Re: Commercial .debs
john
Re: Commercial .debs
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: Commercial .debs
john
Re: Commercial .debs
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Commercial .debs
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Commercial .debs
Raul Miller
Re: Commercial .debs
Clint Guillot
Re: Commercial .debs
Raul Miller
Re: Fixes (in terms of bugs)
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Fixes (in terms of bugs)
James LewisMoss
Re: Fixes (in terms of bugs)
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Fixes (in terms of bugs)
Julian Gilbey
html changelogs
Joey Hess
Re: html changelogs
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#29955 closed
Bob Hilliard
Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Santiago Vila
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Michael Alan Dorman
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
James LewisMoss
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
James Troup
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Zed Pobre
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Manoj Srivastava
Processed: Handle all remaining packaging manual bugs
Debian Bug Tracking System
gcc or cc?
Matthias Klose
Re: gcc or cc?
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Re: gcc or cc?
Michael Stone
Re: gcc or cc?
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Re: gcc or cc?
Anders Hammarquist
Re: gcc or cc?
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Re: gcc or cc?
Anders Hammarquist
priorities and package relations
Wichert Akkerman
Re: priorities and package relations
Santiago Vila
Bug#30122: [PROPOSED] Fix bad advice about conffile management
Steve Greenland
Bug#30122: PROPOSED] Fix bad advice about conffile management
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#30122: [PROPOSED] Fix bad advice about conffile management
Steve Greenland
policy is now outdated WRT /etc/X11/Xresources
Joey Hess
Bug#30148: list of current policy editors should be public
Adam Di Carlo
Bug#30148: list of current policy editors should be public
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#22308: [PROPOSED] bug reports against policy -- COMPLETE
Adam Di Carlo
Processed: [PROPOSED] bug reports against policy -- COMPLETE take 2
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Changing this to a proposal
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Managing policy bugs
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Proposal (restricted packages)
Yann Dirson
Processed: Bug#17525: dinstall stuff
Debian Bug Tracking System
md5sums
Joey Hess
Re: md5sums
Jason Gunthorpe
The last update was on 12:08 GMT Tue May 07. There are 255 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc