Re: /var/mail back to /var/spool/mail
- To: tytso@mit.edu, bandregg@redhat.com
- Cc: quinlan@pathname.com, fhs-discuss@ucsd.edu, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: /var/mail back to /var/spool/mail
- From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 19:30:55 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19980605193055.M3613@test.legislate.com>
- Mail-followup-to: tytso@mit.edu, bandregg@redhat.com, quinlan@pathname.com, fhs-discuss@ucsd.edu, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199806051027.GAA00455@rsts-11.mit.edu>; from tytso@mit.edu on Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 06:27:54AM -0400
- References: <[🔎] 199806021735.NAA01525@sideshow.redhat.com> <[🔎] 199806051027.GAA00455@rsts-11.mit.edu>
tytso@mit.edu <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> and creating the symlink right away should work just fine. If they
> aren't on the same filesystem, the easist way to do the upgrade is to
> install a self-deleting script in /etc/rc.d/init.d which moves the
> directory and then installs the compatibility symlink. That way the
Just be careful to not hose the system if there's not enough space.
> The reason for going to /var/mail is to compatible with the other Unix
> systems in the world. Getting rid of #ifdef Linux in people's programs
> is a *good* thing.
Note that a symlink is perfectly adequate for this end.
So far I see one storage management argument for /var/spool/mail/ and
one compatibility argument for having mail accessible at /var/mail/.
This looks like a strong case for a symlink to me.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: