[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#19920: Packages Optional, should be Extra



In article <[🔎] E0yFjc6-0005OQ-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> Ian Jackson wrote:

>> Other programs *should* use it. It takes over /dev/audio when it runs,
>> because it is a server. Because most programs that use sound have
>> their own small server, only one sound program can run at once. With
>> the rational you gave, *all* packages that have sound should be extra,
>> because they are preventing each other. NAS is providing a solution
>> for this problem if you build the programs to use it (but then you get
>> other problems, as NAS is slower than direct access).
>
>No, because if you install NAS it hogs the sound device even when
>you're not using it.  Other sound using programs don't have this
>property.
>
>Until it's policy that all sound-using programs should use NAS (and
>this seems unlikely any time soon) then NAS as currently shipped is
>buggy because it makes it impossible to run other sound-using programs
>on machines where it is installed, unlike all other sound-using
>programs.
>
>Therefore it should be Extra.

Agreed for now, and as I've volunteered to take over maintenance I'll move
it there. The package could do with a lot of work, and will probably
prompt me to post here a few times asking for advice/preferences. Maybe it
would even be possible for a patched nas to _not_ grab the audio device,
but instead to open it only when necessary. I'll be investigating this.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, CURS CCE, Cambridge, UK.         stevem@chiark.greenend.org.uk
<a href=http://www.rpg-soc.ucam.org/curs/>CURS home page</a>
"Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,                 +------------------
"Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I..."  |Finger for PGP key


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: