Re: Bug#19503: sp: Illegal version number
srivasta@datasync.com writes:
> Package: sp
> Version: 1.3-1.1-2
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> This is not a legal version number.
I (who suggested this version number for sp) use such a numbering
scheme for packages ss2g, comerr2g, ssg-dev, comerrg-dev, which are,
as sp_1.3 is included in the upstream jade_1.1, included in upstream
e2fsprogs, but with non-matching version numbers.
I raised this issue on deb-policy in January, in a thread named
"Versionning of non-standalone library packages". It did not appear
that anybody got concerned by this except for Christian, but I saw no
objections to its use.
What do other think ?
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@a2points.com> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
alt-email: <dirson@univ-mlv.fr> | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email: <dirson@debian.org> | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: