Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?

To: Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Date: 06 Nov 1998 23:04:56 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 87zpa4pgmf.fsf@nocrew.org>
In-reply-to: Marcus Brinkmann's message of "Fri, 6 Nov 1998 23:03:33 +0100"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.981106115027.2179A-100000@cantor.unex.es> <[🔎] 87g1bx82hi.fsf@nocrew.org> <[🔎] 19981106230333.D29554@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:

> Erhm, because the Hurd does use a different source package/version?

So?  So do glibc2.1 based architectures and they still use the same
binary names.

-- 
James

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
  - From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

References:
- RE: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
  - From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
- Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
  - From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Policy for /usr/doc/<pkg-name>-doc
Next by Date: Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Previous by thread: Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Next by thread: Re: It is ok to have a hardcoded Depends: libc6-dev ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread