Re: Comments on policy modifications
Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl> writes:
> Oh... then this is a new thing :) I maintain several packages that
> install their html documentation uncompressed, because compressed
> html was useless.
I've got compressed html in the libtiff3g directory, and I just
confirmed Manoj's findings - netscape, w3, and lynx can all handle it
but don't follow internal links if they don't have the .gz extension.
dwww is the best, handling a compressed hierarchy of html pages even
though though all the ref's don't have .gz appended to them.
Guy
Reply to: