Re: Comments on policy modifications
> Compressed html changelogs:
>
> If I understand correctly, Manoj's argument is basically that
> except for extreme circumstances, the lack of convenience in dealing
> with compressed html changelogs outweighs the size benefits. On that
> matter I don't really have a firm conviction one way or the other, but I
> have no idea what "arbitrary size" would be considered appropriate to
> require compression. Is it reasonable to leave the decision to compress
> up to the individual developer? I think I would prefer that to a number
> arbitrarily carved in stone.
i would definitley prefer one or the other. i think non-compressed is the
way to go. consider this: slowe machines would crumble on unzipping larger
files, but newer machines would have plenty of space. i really think we
should push for consistency.
--------------------------------------------------------
# Justin Maurer GNOME Hacker
# justin@openprojects.net Debian Developer
# http://slashdot.org/ Slashdot Author
# 09 84 FC 03 13 AA 4A AF F6 A4 85 9D 8C 96 B6 A4
--------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: