Re: nouser/nogroup clarification
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> Lacking a formal process, I would still like to reasonable
> sure that the change indeed is something to which there is no serious
> objection; and that requires, I think, possibly an announcement on
> Debian devel (stating the change, and requesting any objections to be
> posted to the debian-policy list); and a two week waiting period for
> objections to be presented.
Makes sense.
So we kick each issue around on debian-policy until a consensus appears
to have emerged, I then produce a diff showing what is going to be changed and
publish it as a two week warning on debian-devel, with supporting argument
summarised from debian-policy (where needed), and encouraging people to say why
the change should not happen.
Is that fair enough ?
Cheers, Phil.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: