Re: Version numbers with parallel frozen and unstable releases
Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@icenet.fi> writes:
> There is no such need between hamm and slink, so I think that using
> the usual convention for NMU (package_1-2.1 ) would be enough.
Can we please not overload the NMU convention? If we do it makes it
very hard to determine when the maintainer last uploaded a package,
making it nigh on impossible to track down absentee maintainers other
than by hand. And absentee maintainers become more of a problem by
the day.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: