Re: Policy as rule of law, or whatever
On Tue, May 19, 1998 at 01:11:31PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think my main problem with the `pro-strong-policy' arguments that
> I've been seeing here is that they seem to imply an assumption that
> policy is by definition correct, and that any point where it wasn't
> the relevant policy document maintainer would agree at once.
This seems reasonable. If adopted, can we define policy to be binding
rather than just recommendations/guidelines? I have real trouble
with the idea of a policy which is non-binding (for Debian at least).
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: