Re: conffiles versus configuration files
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I mean that just because X is a conffile doesn't necessarily imply
> that X is a configuration file, or vice versa.
Could you please tell us some examples of conffiles not being
configuration files, just to make it clearer?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNTYwbiqK7IlOjMLFAQEN5AP+Kx/mzDI1/+2oxW5LxlLFmDsMeo4PmrYE
mZbsvTnq1Q5YjkUKfbMujMfGtY3UiuP1EzyVlh2ypq5xP1zPAoiFpGeqU5Efu6k2
Jyh9V36XZbH9yHhioXZ4WtYuFR0dcEJKKQyOtMPAq+CFGpM5nQCwBanlpq9cm8tv
MauNaDPttTc=
=9/m+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: