Re: Packaging Gimp plugins?
>>>>> "John" == John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:
John> What is the policy on packaging Gimp plugins? There is one
John> in particular (Sharpen) that I'd like to see. Do I just
John> package it up or what?
I agree, this needs a mention in policy. But it should probably be
brought up on debian-policy; I'm forwarding this to the debian-policy
list.
Basically, GIMP plugins can easily be provided by other non-gimp
packages (and are, in SANE) but there is currently no policy
for doing so.
Plug-ins currently go into /usr/lib/gimp/0.99/ -- I'm assuming this
will change to 1.0 when 1.0 is released.
Is it kosher to just have any package dump a plug-in into this
directory?
--
Brought to you by the letters S and Q and the number 6.
"You should be glad you don't have diaper rash. Mah Jongg." -- The Critic
Ben Gertzfield <http://www.imsa.edu/~wilwonka/> Finger me for my public
PGP key. I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: