Re: IMPORTANT: calling ldconfig in maintainer scripts
Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de> writes:
> The result of this discussion surprises me. I remember a few other
> discussions on this topic here and the result has always been: `the
> packaging manual is completely correct--if everyone does it exactly as
> it's documented, we won't have any problems'.
The last two threads on this I've seen did start that way, but
eventually, David popped up and straightened things out. I was the
one that started one of these threads about 6 months ago. It's my
understanding that the packaging manual is incorrect.
Since David is one of the ld.so upstream authors, I'd be inclined to
believe him.
> Does someone know which technical aspects we forgot in all these
> discussions or which part of it has changed now??
I'd send the bit of proposed manual text to David Engel
<david@debian.org>, and he should be able to make sure it's OK.
--
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94 53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: