Re: need input: essential packages and pre-depends
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Craig Small wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Is there a reason why this package lost his essential flag?
> This was discussed in debian-devel about 3 months ago, the consensus was
> it is not essential. Neither was psmisc.
Ok, ok, please no flames. I simply did not remember that discussion.
Sorry.
Definitely we need a list of essential and required packages explaining
why they are essential and why they are not.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNRgqJiqK7IlOjMLFAQGt1wQAin/j9LFdtNXSV/3VzWpC6LFUT5u5zaDd
dCVUsINI55TmPAGDqK/L0AqRqPjR+3vAnycMtePTml8aJBcBdMmViR978U4Okeit
siN6tsKWDm1Dx9McNs5fetN6a6AjUkNvh0GNNr9I2u6dBjTtyvk0lfxjDdVIAb25
xxhcMwvuVVA=
=IQ3A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: