Re: Wht remove /usr/local dirs in prerm rather than postrm?
On 13 Mar 1998, Rob Browning wrote:
>
> Is there some good reason? I guess it depends on the interpretation
> of "postrm".
>
> It seemed to me like it might make sense to remove them in the postrm
> where you know that anything that might have referenced this directory
> is gone, and can't be executed again.
>
> Just curious. I don't think it'll affect me one way or the other. I
> did have the emacsen-common package doing some final cleanup in the
> postrm (removing files that had been created in the preinst). I
> suppose given this policy, I should probably change that too...
Just curious. What are you doing in /usr/local? I thought no package
should touch /usr/local.
Remco
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: