[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: policy violation and bug reports. - some resolution?



On Mon, Feb 23, 1998 at 09:09:07AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 4) dpkg should know about these files and NOT screw with them in the course
> of a package upgrade, and not remove them unless "--purge" is specified
> (hence they are a conffile by the definition given by Dale above, and
> should probably be provided in zero-length versions for the sake of the
> inital install)

If you don't provide them and don't mention them in conffiles, then
dpkg won't know about them at all, so it can't clobber them. You can remove
them yourself if the postinst is called with purge. Isn't this a better
solution than calling the files conffiles, even though they aren't?



Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.   http://hamish.home.ml.org

Attachment: pgp53_4WD1CeD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: