Re: About sections contents

To: aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu
Cc: ydirson@a2points.com (Yann Dirson), debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: About sections contents
From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 19:18:08 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 199802201918.TAA11054@linda.lfix.co.uk>
In-reply-to: Message from Alex Yukhimets <aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu> of Fri, 20 Feb 1998 11:00:46 EST. <[🔎] E0y5usY-0000Hm-00@alex.y.dyndns.com>

Alex Yukhimets wrote:
  >> I just noticed that 2 similar apps (cbb and xacc) were placed in 2
  >> different sections (misc and utils).  I filed a bug against ftp.deb
  >> for this, but without suggesting a solution.
  >
  >Hi.
  >
  >Same thing with databases - they all are placed in diferent sections.
  >
  >May be we should create a separate sections for them?

Yes. I put postgresql in misc, but databases deserve their own section.
We now have postgresql, mysql and msql and there are likely to be others
in the future.

By the same token, we could do with an Apps/Database section in menus.

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver

PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1

Reply to:

References:
- Re: About sections contents
  - From: Alex Yukhimets <aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu>

Prev by Date: GNUstep and /usr/GNUstep...
Next by Date: Re: What about lib/*.la files?
Previous by thread: Re: About sections contents
Next by thread: new policy topic: cron jobs (sec 3.5)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread