Re: beta software ok for unstable? (was: Re: policy Q's WRT imapd)
G John Lapeyre <lapeyre@newton.physics.arizona.edu> writes:
> Where can I put a package that is not dangerous, and is
> functional, but is still in early stages of development? I imagine it
> might detract a bit from the rest of the stable distribution, and yet
> there are perhaps some who would like access to it.
Unstable.
I have no problem with a small subset of packages going to
experimental. But a package which doesn't exist in unstable and isn't
dangerous can certainly go to unstable.
Guy
Reply to: