[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: beta software ok for unstable? (was: Re: policy Q's WRT imapd)



G John Lapeyre <lapeyre@newton.physics.arizona.edu> writes:

> 	Where can I put a package that is not dangerous, and is
> functional, but is still in early stages of development?  I imagine it
> might detract a bit from the rest of the stable distribution, and yet
> there are perhaps some who would like access to it.

Unstable.

I have no problem with a small subset of packages going to
experimental.  But a package which doesn't exist in unstable and isn't
dangerous can certainly go to unstable.


Guy


Reply to: