/bin/sh as an alternative

["Adam P. Harris" <apharris@onshore.com>]

[Sorry to be offtopic a bit]

"Remco" == Remco Blaakmeer <remco@Cal011205.student.utwente.nl> writes:
> I also think the
> link /bin/sh could be perfectly managed by the `alternatives'
> system, with the `smallest' shell (in terms of memory and processor
> requirements) having the highest priority.

How about "most standard", i.e., most in accordance w/ POSIX?  ;)
Anyone have any information about the POSIXability of different
shells, their indices of POSIXal correctness?  Of course, bash behaves
different when invoked as /bin/sh compared to /bin/bash.

.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>