Re: Policy about packages that have Tk dependent parts.
Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu> writes:
> Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> writes:
> > 1) Create two packages: foo and foo-tk
>
> I can't see any real downsides to this. If `foo' suggests `foo-tk'
> (and `foo-tk' depends on `foo'), then we've got the best of both
> worlds.
OK, this seems to be the best idea. I'll get started on it. I can
always change it later if someone has convincing arguments against
this approach.
--
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94 53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30
Reply to: