Santiago Vila Doncel wrote: > Another idea: In addition to "hello_1.3-14_i386.changes" we could have > "hello_1.3-14_i386.closes", following a very simple syntax: > > 1234 > 5678 > 9012 If we use this, you don't get the benefit of seeing the bugs that were closed by each release, in the changelog. (Well, you can still note them in the changelog, but that's duplication of work.) -- see shy jo