Re: DEBIAN POLICY WEEKLY, #4 (October 23, 1997)
- To: Debian Development <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: DEBIAN POLICY WEEKLY, #4 (October 23, 1997)
- From: "Marco d'Itri" <md@linux.it>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 15:38:50 +0200
- Message-id: <19971024153850.47133@wonderland>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.971023225153.17246E-100000@monet>; from Christian Schwarz on Thu, Oct 23, 1997 at 10:52:42PM +0200
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.971023225153.17246E-100000@monet>
[Please Cc all replies.]
On Oct 23, Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de> wrote:
>I suggest to change policy so that every Debian package has to use
>liblockdev to lock/unlock devices.
We should not force to modify all packages, not every maintainer is a C
programmer who knows how to modify the source.
>Wouldn't it be good if every script in /etc/init.d would start with a shell
>variable that's set to 0 or 1, depending on whether the daemon should be
>started at boot up time or not? For example:
What about testing for some file like /etc/run-on-boot/package?
If the sysadmin changes the script, at the next upgrade dpkg will bother
him.
--
ciao,
Marco
Reply to: