Re: too much for an NMU?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net>, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>I think I understand the argument, but I also think I disagree. I
>think it's a Bad Thing to make this work differently from the upstream
>version, whatever we do. Front-ends (e.g. pilot-manager, maybe
>others) may look for the output on a particular stream and be
>surprised (and fail to work) when it doesn't appear where they expect.
I don't know of any interfaces where someone scripts with the command
line tools. Since the pilot-link libraries have been ported to many
scripting environments (Perl, Python, Java, Tcl) people choose one of
those and use that. But expect a post to the pilot-unix group. :)
The idea of having an option is a good one. Possibly the maintainer can
use that we he integrates my changes back into his release.
Darren
- --
<torin@daft.com> <http://www.daft.com/~torin> <torin@debian.org> <torin@io.com>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-800-921-4996
@ Sysadmin, webweaver, postmaster for hire. C/Perl/CGI/Pilot programmer/tutor @
@ Make a little hot-tub in your soul. @
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.1, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBN568244wrq++1Ls5AQEZcAP9Gi5j+tE3vg+5aN5Peb11QGbhE5dK5p5d
4KCtdEm6DH16VukrpYSE2BMN7r40kICIX0WKgUITZqe9IyUXtoPGxH6yWCRkR8Jh
OUxf6gsN+5DK7UPuqyu60gnp9iZs20e0N+SZS2Bxwe0vMt103Rkb/ZztLkUmlSRL
Kd4p8PUHrCQ=
=wYnf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: