Re: too much for an NMU?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Diane Trout <detrout@earthlink.net>, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 07:09:07PM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
>> #40336: pilot-link: can't compile gnome-pilot
>>
>> which I think are definitely too much for an NMU...
>
>I haven't gotten that far into reading the debian policies yet, but
>it'd certainly make my life easier if that "bug" was fixed. I've been
>making my own package of pilot-link so I can try to compile
>gnome-pilot.
The entries on NMU are rather clear: "Make as few changes as possible."
Some of my changes are possibly a bit much. Going to a new source tree
definitely would be.
I'm cc'ing the maintainer, Dermot Bradley. If he doesn't
respond in two weeks, then I'll make an NMU of the code with conduit
stuff in it. Of course, I also have to check this with the folks on
pilot-unix and especially Kenneth Albanowski to find out why the code is
missing in the first place.
Darren
- --
<torin@daft.com> <http://www.daft.com/~torin> <torin@debian.org> <torin@io.com>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-800-921-4996
@ Sysadmin, webweaver, postmaster for hire. C/Perl/CGI/Pilot programmer/tutor @
@ Make a little hot-tub in your soul. @
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.1, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBN51pBI4wrq++1Ls5AQGq/QP6AuQSKcaLTVZGe/HY4Qz57ZJeKDOROrG5
nY/rK3m106mhgsxqT69aqIm7tst/DT8AwPXs/znyxc8SFmQER7xZU1AYIBXI3tmq
2/0J/jPg09LsAZzrJK/CgQk2mqPMeYlsCQJYiBu82ERBowdEec+nKD1n/kD0m5dP
21WEUBqGMfQ=
=e5om
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: