On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 13:28 +0100, Dave Walker wrote: > For me, I didn't respond because I have moved on to other things and > the original announcement said no-response would be considered leave > by inaction. I wasn't aware of that aspect of the announcement. > I didn't see the point in cluttering someones mailbox when an > intentional non-response was acceptable. I am sure I am not the only > one. So I think it would be a mistake to assume people that didn't > respond are MIA. Agreed. So just folks with bouncing mail should be reported as MIA. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part