On Sat, 09 Jul 2016 05:23:38 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: > > but it's quite easy: > Sounds like the same kind of thing that I'd do for a new upstream but in > this case using a new branch? (and which I'd need to comment on since PET > doesn't track such things?) Right. > > - in git create a branch jessie-backports starting from the debian/* > > tag corresponding to the version in stable > Don't you mean Testing in this case? I know I also mentioned jessie-pu but > since the 'fix' was in a newer upstream version, i though it would be more > appropriate to put it to jessie-backports. Yup, sorry for the confusion (also to Tincho). Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature