Re: Call for testing: lib{moo, roles-tiny, strictures}-perl 2.000001-1 in experimental
Hi Jonas!
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I'm not sure if I can test all reverse (build-)dependencies in time as
> > I currently have no setup for such automated tests. So I'd be glad if
> > someone with such a setup could have a look, maybe even under Perl
> > 5.22.
>
> Seems quite a few of those are "mine".
>
> I am currently in Peru with extremely slow internet access¹. I would
> prefer to not go through testing all those packages until I am back
> home: End of July.
No worries.
> If urgent
I don't think so.
> can someone else do those tests?
I think so.
Everything which has a test suite should be testable by anyone. :-)
> One odd package is boxer: It is written by me and lack proper testsuite.
> Please simply skip that, and leave it to me to fix eventual breakage.
Ok, will do.
> ¹We - my partner Siri and I - are right next to the jungle (quite
> exciting!) on a self-made month-long hacking marathon to improve Sugar
> in Debian.
Ah, that's why there are so many new Sugar packages!
> Internet is ~12KB/s shared among 4 persons - not because of the
> exotic location but simply because we've used up the monthly quota.
> :-)
Hehe.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Reply to: