[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for testing: lib{moo, roles-tiny, strictures}-perl 2.000001-1 in experimental

Hi Jonas!

Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I'm not sure if I can test all reverse (build-)dependencies in time as 
> > I currently have no setup for such automated tests. So I'd be glad if 
> > someone with such a setup could have a look, maybe even under Perl 
> > 5.22.
> Seems quite a few of those are "mine".
> I am currently in Peru with extremely slow internet access¹.  I would 
> prefer to not go through testing all those packages until I am back 
> home: End of July.

No worries.
> If urgent

I don't think so.

> can someone else do those tests?

I think so.

Everything which has a test suite should be testable by anyone. :-)

> One odd package is boxer: It is written by me and lack proper testsuite.  
> Please simply skip that, and leave it to me to fix eventual breakage.

Ok, will do.

> ¹We - my partner Siri and I - are right next to the jungle (quite 
> exciting!) on a self-made month-long hacking marathon to improve Sugar 
> in Debian.

Ah, that's why there are so many new Sugar packages!

> Internet is ~12KB/s shared among 4 persons - not because of the
> exotic location but simply because we've used up the monthly quota.
> :-)


		Regards, Axel
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

Reply to: