Re: RfC: Moving not-pkg-perl-team-specific lintian tests from pkg-perl-tools to lintian proper
Hi Gregor,
thanks for your insight!
gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2015 21:32:29 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > My main movation is to get the check application-not-library with the
> > following tags into lintian:
> > * libapp-perl-package-name
> > * library-package-name-for-application
> > * application-in-library-section
>
> I'm seeing quite a few false positives with those checks;
I assume that you don't include libapp-perl-package-name in that
statement. I consider that tag to be quite precise: "Certainty:
certain"
With regards to library-package-name-for-application and
application-in-library-section, I've set "Certainty: possible" and
currently expect people to add overrides if the check is wrong:
In case the program in $PATH is only a helper tool and the package is
primarily a library, please add a lintian override for this tag.
But yes, those tests will generate false positives and I currently
have no idea how to reduce the amount of false positives noticably.
> but as long as they stay at the experimental level I have no
> objections :)
Of course the idea is that we can remove the experimental flag at some
time, hence I'm happy about ideas how to reduce the amount of false
positives.
> For the other checks, I think
> - the severity might be lowered on some of them
> (not everything is a horrible error even if we don't want it in the
> perl group)
Thanks for that hint. I think it especially applies to the check if
the Perl Module name is present in the package description.
> - the CDBS ones would probably benefit from a review by Jonas
> (I tried to pick the correct versions from cdbs' changelog but I
> might have been wrong somewhere)
Ok, will either not included before Jonas reviewed it or mark it as
experimental.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Reply to: